Please enter your username below and press the send button.A password reset link will be sent to you.
If you are unable to access the email address originally associated with your Delicious account, we recommend creating a new account.
This link recently saved by uduogah on January 19, 2011
What part of this Supreme Law do they not understand? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers[data], and effects[cellphones], against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things [phones] to be seized." It was adopted as a response to the abuse of the British Writ of Assistance, which is a type of general search warrant, during the 1760s and 70s and their use forbidden in 1776 when the Colonies declared themselves independent States.
Cellphones should not be searchable until a police officer stands before a judge and obtains a warrant, and swears an oath that he, the officer, is telling the truth (and punishable with Perjury if not).
--ASIMOV'S EDITORIAL - The Price (and profit) of Free Products http://www.asimovs.com/_issue_1002/onthenet.shtml
This link recently saved by uduogah on December 15, 2010
This link recently saved by uduogah on October 11, 2010
This link recently saved by uduogah on May 03, 2010
This link recently saved by uduogah on September 09, 2009
This link recently saved by uduogah on July 03, 2009