Please enter your username below and press the send button.A password reset link will be sent to you.
If you are unable to access the email address originally associated with your Delicious account, we recommend creating a new account.
This link recently saved by webmink on June 29, 2011
There's more to this than meets the eye. I agree with Matthew that the industry's pervasive embrace of open source has made the term less of a differentiator, but another factor is the realisation by some of these vendors that their product is not fundamentally about delivering software freedom.
This link recently saved by webmink on February 27, 2011
This link recently saved by webmink on February 16, 2011
Despite all the rhetoric from Microsoft's evangelists, they just can't get over their hatred and fear of software freedom. This sweeping rule ensures they can't even have software under Microsoft's own OSI-approved licenses. Looking forward to the spin explaining why this is all OK.
This link recently saved by webmink on February 11, 2011
This link recently saved by webmink on September 28, 2010
This link recently saved by webmink on June 26, 2010
This link recently saved by webmink on April 05, 2010
JP has written here a long article about the potential unintended consequences of the Digital Economy Bill for the music industry. I disagree slightly with his continued focus on the downloads aspect. The biggest problems with the bill are that, in the name of protecting Cliff Richard's pension, it will remove photographers' rights, eliminate open wifi, enable easy censorship for unethical corporations and introduce other abuses the way the DMCA did)
His analysis is still worth reading to bring home the fact that the Bill dabbles inexpertly in an incredibly complex area of interlocking ecosystems and will upset them just as surely as introducing cane toads did in Australia.
This link recently saved by webmink on February 21, 2010
This is an interesting and useful article by a musician (from OK Go) whose work rose to great success through "viral" word-of-mouth video (the one with the people on running machines) but who now can't succeed with the same approach becuase their dinosaur record label EMI insists on "monetising video streams" and thus prevents them letting fans embed their new videos on fan web sites.
The failure of the music industry illustrated in cameo. Why would we want to let people who think like this shape our legislative future around the internet and copyright?
This link recently saved by webmink on February 20, 2010
"When asked about Obama's plan (without being given any details about what the legislation includes), 49 percent opposed it and 40 percent were in favor. But after hearing key features of the legislation described, 48 percent supported the plan and 43 percent remained opposed." -- Why let the facts get in the way of knee-jerk rage, after all?